Other Prohibited Behavior
Other Prohibited Behavior is a term which, at the University of California, encompasses Invasions of Sexual Privacy, and four other behaviors. This section describes from the policy definitions of Other Prohibited Behavior.
For additional information on Other Prohibited Behaviors regarding your options and support resources, please see the UC Davis Sexual Violence website and/or a printable brochure with a summary of the information.
Prohibited Conduct Outlined in Other Prohibited Behavior
- Invasions of Sexual Privacy
- Sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 18.
- Exposing one’s genitals in a public place for the purpose of sexual gratification.
- Failing to comply with the terms of a no-contact order, a suspension of any length, or any order of exclusion issued under this Policy.
- Engaging in Retaliation.
To determine whether conduct is DOE-Covered Conduct the Title IX Officer will do the assessment and apply the definitions in Appendix IV. The definitions here are broader than and encompass all conduct included in the DOE-Covered Conduct.
Invasions of Sexual Privacy Examples
-
Without a person’s consent, watching or enabling others to watch that person’s nudity or sexual acts in a place where that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy;
-
Without a person’s consent, making or attempting to make photographs (including videos) or audio recordings, or posting, transmitting or distributing such recorded material, depicting that person’s nudity or sexual acts in a place where that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy; or
-
Using depictions of nudity or sexual activity to extort something of value from a person.
-
Threatening to post or share depictions of nudity or sexual activity unless a person takes a particular action.
Engaging in Retaliation Defined
- SVSH Policy Definition
- The University prohibits Retaliation against someone for reporting possible Prohibited Conduct or participating or not participating in a process under this Policy.
Retaliation is defined as an adverse action against a person based on their report or other disclosure of alleged Prohibited Conduct to a University employee, or their participation in, refusal to participate in, or assistance with the investigation, reporting, remedial, or disciplinary processes provided for in this Policy.
An adverse action is conduct that would discourage a reasonable person from reporting Prohibited Conduct or participating in a process provided for in this Policy, such as threats, intimidation, harassment, discrimination and coercion. Good faith actions lawfully pursued in response to a report of Prohibited Conduct (such as gathering evidence) are not, without more, retaliation. - Discrimination and Harassment Policy Definition
- Retaliation is defined as an adverse action against an individual based on:
a. their report or other disclosure of alleged Discrimination and/or Harassment to a University employee or
b. their participation in, or assistance with, the investigative process, reporting, remedial, or corrective action/disciplinary processes provided for in this Policy.
An adverse action is defined as conduct that would discourage a reasonable person from reporting Discrimination and/or Harassment or participating in a process provided for in this Policy, such as threats, intimidation, coercion, reprisals and adverse employment or educational actions. Good faith actions lawfully pursued in response to a report of Discrimination and/or Harassment (such as gathering evidence) are not, without more, Retaliation.
We encourage you to review the what to do if you are accused website specifically designed for you. This website outlines campus services available to help you understand your rights and the investigation and adjudication processes